Friday, January 5, 2018

Succinct vs. verbose

Succinct vs. verbose

We use all sorts of words to describe writing. Here’s a look at some:

The synonyms wordy & verbose both come from the Proto-Indo-European word were- that meant, not surprisingly, word. Were- made its way through Latin (verbum) to become the English word verbose, while another branch of the were- family tree made its way through Germanic languages (Old Saxon, Frisian, Dutch and Old High German) to become word. Wordy. At some point the Scots generously donated that final –y to wordy, as they did to many English words.

A writer who is wordy might be referred to as prolix, which showed up in English in the 1400s, through Old French, originally from Latin, prolixus, where it meant extended, with a literal translation of flow forth or flowing liquid, a metaphor that works just fine for any of us who’ve spent time on the listening end of a prolix speech or lecture.

In the 1580s, concise came to the language from the Latin word concisus, meaning cut off or brief. Concise is constructed of two bits, con- or com-, meaning with, & -cise or -cide, to cut. This means the word concise translates to something like with cutting, & cutting is exactly what we have to do when our language needs to be more concise.

A synonym of concise is succinct. It’s modern meaning, brief or concise showed up in the 1500s, but its initial meaning in English was “having one’s belt fastened tightly,” & that’s exactly what those of us who tend toward wordiness feel when we’re told we need to be more succinct. The word was born of a Middle French word, which came from the Latin succinctus, which originated in a word meaning to gird from below, arguably referring to an early “support garment” – one that likely felt a bit constricting -- which at least offers imaginative evidence that it was our wordier ancestors who moved succinct into its present meaning.

Fellow writers & readers, what do you have to say about verbosity or succinctness? Do naturally tend toward one or the other? In writing? In speech?


My thanks go out to this week’s sources: the OED, Etymonline. & Wordnik

(this post is a re-run from December 2013)

8 comments:

  1. So, if were means word, would that make a werewolf not a shape shifter, but a word monger?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quite possible, he said, doing his best to shield his teeth with his lips.

      Delete
  2. I wonder if prolix is also where prolific comes from. Funny about succinct. I suppose we could all benefit from tightening our verbose belts a bit. Happy New Year Word Monger!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Christine -- it looks as though the only thing prolix & prolific have in common is the prefix pro-. Happy New Year back to you.

      Delete
  3. I had the same thought as Susan. Are we were-writers? Do werewolves write? And can they write succinctly if they tighten their belts? Haha. :-) Happy New Year!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Happy New Year yourself. And thanks for coming by.

      Delete
  4. HOW CAN A WORD WITH 12 LETTERS (SUCCINCTNESS) ALSO MEAN "BRIEF?" INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmm. The word "vast" has only four letters...

      And the inquiring minds I know are pleased to know that Steve Figler has not been engulfed in mud, as I presume any number of his neighbors have been.

      Delete